December 17, 2017
Jordan R. Pavlus recently obtained a decision issuing a protective order and quashing a subpoena to a non-party witness. The underlying dispute was between a developer and general contractor and involved a large commercial development. The general contractor sought to depose a non-party witness who performed construction consultation duties for the owner on the project. Mr. Pavlus opposed the subpoena and obtained a decision quashing it and granting the protective order. Due to the strategic advantage this created in the litigation, the case settled soon thereafter.